<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Desensitisation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://forensic4cast.com/2009/03/21/desensitisation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://forensic4cast.com/2009/03/21/desensitisation/</link>
	<description>Welcome to our podcast discussing issues relating to digital forensics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:18:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kleanchap</title>
		<link>http://forensic4cast.com/2009/03/21/desensitisation/comment-page-1/#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>kleanchap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 09:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4cast.whitfields.org/?p=184#comment-311</guid>
		<description>I agree with the author on conditioning.  This particular area is a lot more disturbing/uncomfortable to get used to.   No matter how professional you are, it will eventually get to you.  I was involved in ethical hacking project for 3 years in 1997 onwards.  At that time I frequented the hacking websites which had nothing but doom and gloom type of material.  After a week of going to these sites, I told myself that enough is enough.  There is some level of bad you can accept, after which I do not think most normal people will have an appetite for it.  The material itself will emotionally hijack you.

Your colleague must be a real professional to be doing this classification for decades.  I would like to hear some advice from him on how to get some level of reasonable tolerance and be objective during classification process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the author on conditioning.  This particular area is a lot more disturbing/uncomfortable to get used to.   No matter how professional you are, it will eventually get to you.  I was involved in ethical hacking project for 3 years in 1997 onwards.  At that time I frequented the hacking websites which had nothing but doom and gloom type of material.  After a week of going to these sites, I told myself that enough is enough.  There is some level of bad you can accept, after which I do not think most normal people will have an appetite for it.  The material itself will emotionally hijack you.</p>
<p>Your colleague must be a real professional to be doing this classification for decades.  I would like to hear some advice from him on how to get some level of reasonable tolerance and be objective during classification process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Collie</title>
		<link>http://forensic4cast.com/2009/03/21/desensitisation/comment-page-1/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Collie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 10:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4cast.whitfields.org/?p=184#comment-256</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with your sentiments.  I have heard people say they get desensitized to viewing this type of material but I couldn&#039;t, personally. It is utterly sickening. 
Working mainly for the defense on criminal issues, I&#039;m always careful to ask the acting solicitor whether the client contests that images of X or Y severity exist on the equipment in question or whether the client contests how they got there. Affirmative to the latter means I can avoid viewing most of the stuff, verifying placement on path and file name.
I&#039;m quite happy to accept the Prosecution&#039;s grading in these circs, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with your sentiments.  I have heard people say they get desensitized to viewing this type of material but I couldn&#8217;t, personally. It is utterly sickening.<br />
Working mainly for the defense on criminal issues, I&#8217;m always careful to ask the acting solicitor whether the client contests that images of X or Y severity exist on the equipment in question or whether the client contests how they got there. Affirmative to the latter means I can avoid viewing most of the stuff, verifying placement on path and file name.<br />
I&#8217;m quite happy to accept the Prosecution&#8217;s grading in these circs, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://forensic4cast.com/2009/03/21/desensitisation/comment-page-1/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 20:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4cast.whitfields.org/?p=184#comment-247</guid>
		<description>You have one person does all the categorising?!!  What a horrific job!  I wouldn&#039;t want to put that kind of a load on one person.  I had a horrific job this last week with several thousand level 1-4s but I will get a couple of frauds or a drugs investigation next, thats just the way we spread the jobs.  Breaking it up makes it tolerable, if I was dealing with it all the time, it&#039;d unhinge me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have one person does all the categorising?!!  What a horrific job!  I wouldn&#8217;t want to put that kind of a load on one person.  I had a horrific job this last week with several thousand level 1-4s but I will get a couple of frauds or a drugs investigation next, thats just the way we spread the jobs.  Breaking it up makes it tolerable, if I was dealing with it all the time, it&#8217;d unhinge me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Hurst</title>
		<link>http://forensic4cast.com/2009/03/21/desensitisation/comment-page-1/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Hurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 20:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4cast.whitfields.org/?p=184#comment-246</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a very good point, well made I think. As a mere student of DF, I can&#039;t claim to have any experience of abuse images, but I ALWAYS want to be appalled by even the idea of the content, never mind actually facing it. It&#039;s a task I&#039;m sure I won&#039;t enjoy, but one I hope I will be satisfied in doing - for the eventual outcome.

On that last paragraph - combining expertise in DF and child psychology or specific study of crimes against children would be useful in an organisation like CEOP perhaps? And are specialist organisations, combining CEOP&#039;s brief with investigative intentions, feasible?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a very good point, well made I think. As a mere student of DF, I can&#8217;t claim to have any experience of abuse images, but I ALWAYS want to be appalled by even the idea of the content, never mind actually facing it. It&#8217;s a task I&#8217;m sure I won&#8217;t enjoy, but one I hope I will be satisfied in doing &#8211; for the eventual outcome.</p>
<p>On that last paragraph &#8211; combining expertise in DF and child psychology or specific study of crimes against children would be useful in an organisation like CEOP perhaps? And are specialist organisations, combining CEOP&#8217;s brief with investigative intentions, feasible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
